Multi-Lingual Access
From Library Success: A Best Practices Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* A multi-lingual collection is very costly and at best could contain a handful of languages. | * A multi-lingual collection is very costly and at best could contain a handful of languages. | ||
* Multi-lingual computer access is a much more reasonable objective for libraries, especially given that there are computing solutions for libraries that include [http://userful.com/products/library-ds-feature-multilingual full support for multiple languages] out of the box. | * Multi-lingual computer access is a much more reasonable objective for libraries, especially given that there are computing solutions for libraries that include [http://userful.com/products/library-ds-feature-multilingual full support for multiple languages] out of the box. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: Improving Access]] | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 20 May 2006
Quick wins in terms of supporting multi-lingual access in the library:
- A multi-lingual collection is very costly and at best could contain a handful of languages.
- Multi-lingual computer access is a much more reasonable objective for libraries, especially given that there are computing solutions for libraries that include full support for multiple languages out of the box.
