Learning from failure
From Library Success: A Best Practices Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Waltcrawford (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Why am I not surprised? | Why am I not surprised? | ||
--[[User:Waltcrawford|Waltcrawford]] 12:40, 5 August 2008 (EDT) | --[[User:Waltcrawford|Waltcrawford]] 12:40, 5 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | [http://www.prlog.org/11289974-phone-number-lookup-verizon-phone-number-reverse-lookup-to-get-information-you-need-quickly.html reverse lookup] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://thetvtopc.com/Reverse_Cell_Phone_Lookup_Number reverse phone lookup] | ||
Revision as of 05:45, 3 January 2012
Ideally, we can learn more from failure than we can from success. Are we (you) willing to share failures?
I know: The word itself makes you nervous. They aren't failures. They're learning experiences. They're premature innovations. They're qualified successes.
Here's the definition I'm using:
- Failure:An initiative or process that was either terminated before a planned ending date or that failed to achieve the stated goals.
Contributions? I'll create a "Failure" subcategory when (if) there are any pages that start here...
There's also a Learning from failure page on the Library Leadership Network. --Waltcrawford 12:41, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
And, in a mere three months with publicity elsewhere, we've seen the number of shared failures I was more-or-less expecting here: Zero.
Why am I not surprised? --Waltcrawford 12:40, 5 August 2008 (EDT) reverse lookup
